George DiabConsulting
// AI-built app review · $2,000

Find out what your AI-built app is ready for

Your app works in the demo. That does not tell you whether one customer can see another customer's data, whether the structure will hold up as usage grows, or whether the next feature will force a rewrite. I review the code, configuration, dependencies, and the user paths that matter. You get a plain-English verdict and an ordered repair plan.

Ask me to scope the review

A free 15-minute look confirms whether your application fits the $2,000 package. If it does not, I will narrow the review, quote a different scope, or tell you what kind of specialist you need.

// The deliverable

A verdict you can act on

01

Verdict

Proceed, repair before wider use, or reconsider the current foundation. I give you the call first, then the evidence behind it.

02

Ranked findings

Security, architecture, reliability, and performance risks ranked by consequence. Each finding starts with what it could mean for your users or your business.

03

Repair plan

An ordered plan with enough technical direction for an engineer to estimate the work. You can ask me to help, or take the report to someone else.

04

Walkthrough

A call of up to 60 minutes after delivery. We cover the verdict, the highest risks, and the decisions that come next.

// Where I look

The parts that usually fail outside the demo

  • Login, sessions, permissions, and separation between customer accounts
  • Database and file-storage rules, exposed keys, and sensitive data
  • API endpoints, input handling, file uploads, webhooks, and third-party services
  • Dependencies, deployment settings, and unsafe leftovers from AI coding tools
  • Architecture that blocks new features or makes ordinary changes risky
  • Visible query, resource, recovery, logging, and operating risks

I read the source, run automated checks, and manually verify selected risks. The report states what I checked and what I could not verify.

// The boundary matters

A practical security review, not a penetration test

I look for common security failures that could expose customer data, accounts, money, or operating access. I review the code and configuration you provide, then perform a small number of agreed, non-destructive checks against the running application.

This review does not prove that the application is secure. It does not include sustained exploitation, broad live scanning, social engineering, load testing, compliance certification, or a formal penetration test. If a customer, insurer, regulator, or contract requires a pentest, I will tell you to hire a specialist.

// A fit check before the quote

For founders with a working application and unanswered risk

A fit when

  • You built a web application with AI assistance and now plan to put real users or customer data into it.
  • You can provide the source repository and enough access to understand the deployment.
  • You want an independent answer before you spend more on features or acquisition.
  • You want repair priorities, not a promise that everything is fine.

Not a fit when

  • You need a compliance report or formal penetration test.
  • You need a load test or a guaranteed capacity number.
  • You want fixes included in the review price.
  • You cannot provide the source or authorize the agreed checks.
// How it runs

Scope first, then seven business days to a verdict

  1. Fifteen-minute fit review. You show me the application, repository, stack, and the user paths that matter most.
  2. Written scope. The standard package is $2,000. Before work starts, I name the repository, environment, access, delivery date, and exclusions.
  3. Review and report. I inspect the application and deliver the written findings within seven business days after access is complete.
  4. Walkthrough. After delivery, we review the verdict and repair order on a call of up to 60 minutes.
Ask me to scope the review
// One senior engineer, named up front

One senior engineer, from repository to report

I have been building software since 1998, from web and database systems at Bank of America to engineering management and architecture at Codingscape. I have led technology teams, co-founded a software company, and shipped my own applications. I use AI coding tools every day, so my judgment comes from working code and production systems.

I perform the review myself. The same person who scopes the work reads the repository, writes the report, and walks you through the verdict.

Show me what you built and what worries you

Send the application URL, repository size, technology stack, and the two user actions that would hurt most if they failed. I will tell you whether the $2,000 review fits before you share full access.

Ask me to scope the review

$2,000 for a standard-scope application · seven-business-day report · repairs priced separately · report belongs to you